Further proof there is no “Apple tax”
Tech April 15th, 2009Whenever someone tells me they are thinking about getting a Mac or, when they ask me what computer to buy and I say Mac, generally the response is “but they are so expensive!” Microsoft liked to hammer this point home recently in a series of TV ads. Can you buy a PC for cheaper than a Mac? Absolutely. But can you buy a new car for $6,000? Yes, but would you?
Recently I have been pounding it home to people that you get what you pay for. There is a reason those $400 notebooks at Best Buy are $400. My family has had first hand experience. My sister had a Dell in college that she constantly had problems with and after 4 years was basically unusable. My mom has a notebook (Toshiba maybe?) that was on the cheap side and has had a bunch of problems as well. Now, is this related to the person using it? Perhaps. I use my computers far more than they do, but maybe I take better care of them? I think that is negligible.
I recently stumbled upon this article that tries to “debunk” the Apple tax. They price out a comparable Dell (vs. a 24 inch iMac) and arrive at the conclusion that Dell is $1500 more. Now before your jaw drops, I think they cheated a bit. They spent $150 to upgrade to Vista Ultimate, $200 to get Photoshop (trying to say that iPhoto is a comparable product) and adding WiFi for $70 which most people buying desktops don’t need. The Dell also has 6 GB of RAM vs. 4 GB, 750 GB hard drive vs. 650 GB and a nicer video card. When it’s all said and done there is no way that it’s $1500 cheaper, but, it a minimum it’s a few hundred dollars more to get the Dell.
But if you want to make the argument of buying the $400 Dell notebook, I will make some other points for you. I bought the original MacBook the day it came out in May of 2006. I believe I paid $1099 for it before my company discount. It has been nearly three years and according to the fairly accurate Mac2Sell, my MacBook is worth $460. That is a lot of money 3 years later. I think you would struggle to get anything for a 3-year old $400 Dell notebook, if it’s even running. Then there is the Operating System. Apple is about to release their 3rd version of their OS since I bought that computer in 2006. Vista has since come out since then, but Windows 7 isn’t that close yet. Not to mention the fact that OS X costs $100 for a full version instead of $99 for a pain in the ass upgrade version.
When it’s all said and done, I understand that some people just flat out can’t afford a Mac, but anyone who can and still tries to play the “expensive” card is just uneducated.
April 15th, 2009 at 10:28 pm
I like this article by Tom’s Hardware. This is the cost of trying to build a mac pro replica on your own. They come out be about the same price.
April 15th, 2009 at 10:39 pm
thanks for the link! really great points about holding value…
went with vista ultimate because Mac Os X comes fully featured in one version and the only way to get every feature out of windows is to upgrade to ultimate. I picked the photoshop express & premiere express upgrade because Macs come iLife which includes iPhoto and iMovie and since an out of the box dell doesn’t have them, had to include them. As for the wifi card, for some depending on how their house/apartment is set up wifi can be pretty important.
long story short, i was building the dell to meet the imac and not vice-versa, so tried to be as I could. Thanks again -Brandon
April 16th, 2009 at 8:06 am
Oh I understand what you were going for. I jus don’t think Photoshop and iPhoto are equivalents. And I get what your goal was and you did well. My point was even without those things it’s still cheaper.