<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the iPad is Revolutionary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/01/why-the-ipad-is-revolutionary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/01/why-the-ipad-is-revolutionary/</link>
	<description>Losing weight is like gambling, the more you start with, the more you have to lose.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/01/why-the-ipad-is-revolutionary/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=324#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Printing is a good point. Definitely something I hadn&#039;t thought about.

You made a good point about examples where multitasking could matter to me with chat windows and whatnot. I think there is an implementation of that Apple could use that they don&#039;t. 

Flash, flash, flash, I am SOOOOOO tired of people complaining about this. I will bet money that HTML5 will render flash obsolete within 3 years. 

Overall I agree about the iPad missing the mark. But based on other people&#039;s comments on my post, I think most people missed my point. I don&#039;t think the iPad is a home run. It&#039;s not the iPod or the iPhone. But to me, it&#039;s the original Macintosh. It&#039;s not that everyone will buy or want an iPad. It&#039;s that I think this device is closer to what most people will use as their primary device 5-7 years from now, then what we know as personal computers. Don&#039;t believe me? Go back 8 years ago and see how few people used laptops/notebooks. Nowadays, I bet most people don&#039;t have desktops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Printing is a good point. Definitely something I hadn&#8217;t thought about.</p>
<p>You made a good point about examples where multitasking could matter to me with chat windows and whatnot. I think there is an implementation of that Apple could use that they don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Flash, flash, flash, I am SOOOOOO tired of people complaining about this. I will bet money that HTML5 will render flash obsolete within 3 years. </p>
<p>Overall I agree about the iPad missing the mark. But based on other people&#8217;s comments on my post, I think most people missed my point. I don&#8217;t think the iPad is a home run. It&#8217;s not the iPod or the iPhone. But to me, it&#8217;s the original Macintosh. It&#8217;s not that everyone will buy or want an iPad. It&#8217;s that I think this device is closer to what most people will use as their primary device 5-7 years from now, then what we know as personal computers. Don&#8217;t believe me? Go back 8 years ago and see how few people used laptops/notebooks. Nowadays, I bet most people don&#8217;t have desktops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/01/why-the-ipad-is-revolutionary/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=324#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of what you&#039;ve said Nick, however, to answer your question - &quot;What can&#039;t you do on the iPad that you can on your laptop?&quot;  Several things: First and foremost, it appears that I won&#039;t be able to print from the iPad.  So while it has a word processor and spreadsheet available, if I want to print anything, I have to go to another device.  Secondly, the lack of multitasking was very disappointing.  If I&#039;m going to use a device for kicking back on the couch, surfing the web, email and chat, I want it to be able to have a couple of chat windows open alongside my web browser and email.  I know you&#039;re probably going to point out that the iPhone doesn&#039;t support that, and the startup time of each application is short enough that it maybe isn&#039;t a dealbreaker for most people, but at the same time, on a device this size, I may want or need a browser window open next to an email I&#039;m composing for reference.  Third glaring omission for me: Flash.  Yes, the iPhone can handle YouTube without Flash, but so many websites out there use Flash for their navigation or other content that I don&#039;t think its realistic to use the iPad 100% for causal surfing.  As soon as you click into a story on CNN that has a photo slideshow or video, you&#039;re screwed.  We saw that on the keynote presentation last week.

I&#039;ll give Apple their due where touchscreen tech is concerned -- they have taken consumer-grade touchscreens leaps and bounds into the future.  And I&#039;m keeping my iPhone.  It&#039;s the best smartphone I&#039;ve had, and I&#039;m looking forward to what the next version will have to offer.  However, I think they&#039;ve missed the mark on the iPad.  They&#039;re close, but not quite there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what you&#8217;ve said Nick, however, to answer your question &#8211; &#8220;What can&#8217;t you do on the iPad that you can on your laptop?&#8221;  Several things: First and foremost, it appears that I won&#8217;t be able to print from the iPad.  So while it has a word processor and spreadsheet available, if I want to print anything, I have to go to another device.  Secondly, the lack of multitasking was very disappointing.  If I&#8217;m going to use a device for kicking back on the couch, surfing the web, email and chat, I want it to be able to have a couple of chat windows open alongside my web browser and email.  I know you&#8217;re probably going to point out that the iPhone doesn&#8217;t support that, and the startup time of each application is short enough that it maybe isn&#8217;t a dealbreaker for most people, but at the same time, on a device this size, I may want or need a browser window open next to an email I&#8217;m composing for reference.  Third glaring omission for me: Flash.  Yes, the iPhone can handle YouTube without Flash, but so many websites out there use Flash for their navigation or other content that I don&#8217;t think its realistic to use the iPad 100% for causal surfing.  As soon as you click into a story on CNN that has a photo slideshow or video, you&#8217;re screwed.  We saw that on the keynote presentation last week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give Apple their due where touchscreen tech is concerned &#8212; they have taken consumer-grade touchscreens leaps and bounds into the future.  And I&#8217;m keeping my iPhone.  It&#8217;s the best smartphone I&#8217;ve had, and I&#8217;m looking forward to what the next version will have to offer.  However, I think they&#8217;ve missed the mark on the iPad.  They&#8217;re close, but not quite there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
