<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nick.pazoles.com &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog</link>
	<description>Losing weight is like gambling, the more you start with, the more you have to lose.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>9 Myths &amp; Misconceptions About Viruses</title>
		<link>http://lifehacker.com/5560567/nine-common-myths-and-misconceptions-about-viruses-examined-and-debunked</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/07/9-myths-misconceptions-about-viruses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally great article about Lifehacker that talks about some myths and debunks a lot of things &#8220;non-techy&#8221; people think. Definitely a good read for anyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally great article about Lifehacker that talks about some myths and debunks a lot of things &#8220;non-techy&#8221; people think. Definitely a good read for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/07/9-myths-misconceptions-about-viruses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Subtle Changes You Might Have Missed In iOS 4</title>
		<link>http://nikf.org/post/722500438/8-subtle-changes-you-may-or-may-not-notice-in-ios-4</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/8-subtle-changes-you-might-have-missed-in-ios-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A really good list of new features that are in iOS 4. Some of these I didn&#8217;t even know about. Make sure you click the link at the bottom for even more changes. (via Daring Fireball)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really good list of new features that are in iOS 4. Some of these I didn&#8217;t even know about. Make sure you click the <a href="http://nikf.org/post/726587061/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/nikf.org/post/726587061/?referer=');">link</a> at the bottom for even more changes.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/06/21/fletcher-ios-4" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/daringfireball.net/linked/2010/06/21/fletcher-ios-4?referer=');">Daring Fireball</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/8-subtle-changes-you-might-have-missed-in-ios-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hulu Paid Service Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/29/hulu-plus-announced-ipad-iphone-sony-and-more-on-board/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fengadget+%28Engadget%29</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/hulu-paid-service-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long rumored paid version of Hulu has been announced. For $10 a month you get access to more than the five most recent episodes of a show. Also there will be other content that is only available to paying customers. I think this is going to perfect for a lot of people who don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long rumored paid version of Hulu has been announced. For $10 a month you get access to more than the five most recent episodes of a show. Also there will be other content that is only available to paying customers. I think this is going to perfect for a lot of people who don&#8217;t have TVs, but if all it gives you is recent episodes any die hards won&#8217;t really need it. It will appeal more to people who are too busy to keep up on shows all the time and will use it to get caught up when they have time. I think ultimately Hulu will have to offer no-ads or higher quality content to make it worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/hulu-paid-service-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Buy Now Selling Intel SSDs</title>
		<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/22/intels-x25-m-and-x25-v-ssds-now-stocked-on-best-buys-shelves/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fengadget+%28Engadget%29</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/best-buy-now-selling-intel-ssds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 01:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought an Intel Solid State Drive (SSD) with some unexpected birthday money. It was a totally worthwhile purchase that made a massive performance improvement. In fact if I could have done it all over again I would have just bought that and put it in my old laptop instead of buying a new one. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought an Intel Solid State Drive (SSD) with some unexpected birthday money. It was a totally worthwhile purchase that made a massive performance improvement. In fact if I could have done it all over again I would have just bought that and put it in my old laptop instead of buying a new one. I expect prices to drop significantly in the next year, and while they will still be expensive, it will be better. If you have been considering a new machine, look into an SSD instead. The improvement, for me, was remarkable.</p>
<p>Best Buy selling these is going to help bring them into the mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/best-buy-now-selling-intel-ssds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OS X Text Editor Smultron Reincarnated</title>
		<link>http://lifehacker.com/5569924/fraise-successor-to-smultron-continues-development-of-the-simple-os-x-text-editor</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/os-x-text-editor-smultron-reincarnated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have/had been a long time user of the OS X text editor Smultron. I liked it better than TextWrangler and was never willing to pay for TextMate. Development on Smultron ended about a year ago. It seems unclear whether this is literally the same source code or not, but regardless it shows a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have/had been a long time user of the OS X text editor Smultron. I liked it better than TextWrangler and was never willing to pay for TextMate. Development on Smultron ended about a year ago. It seems unclear whether this is literally the same source code or not, but regardless it shows a lot of promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/os-x-text-editor-smultron-reincarnated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Rose Leaving Diggnation</title>
		<link>http://digg.com/d31U5WQ</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/kevin-rose-leaving-diggnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diggnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revision3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have great admiration for Kevin Rose. Digg is a solid site and I thoroughly enjoyed Diggnation for the last few years (I probably started watching 3 years ago?). It&#8217;s nice to see that he is starting a new show, and I will admit Diggnation was getting a little stale, so maybe it&#8217;s for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have great admiration for Kevin Rose. <a href="http://www.digg.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.digg.com?referer=');">Digg</a> is a solid site and I thoroughly enjoyed <a href="http://www.diggnation.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.diggnation.com?referer=');">Diggnation</a> for the last few years (I probably started watching 3 years ago?). It&#8217;s nice to see that he is starting a new show, and I will admit Diggnation was getting a little stale, so maybe it&#8217;s for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/kevin-rose-leaving-diggnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TUAW iOS4 Multitasking Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/14/multitasking-in-ios4-is-not-a-magical-sparkle-pony/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/tuaw-ios4-multitasking-reality-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article from TUAW on what iOS4 multitasking really means. There are a lot of people who keep reminding the masses that there are only a few applications that will truly &#8220;multitask&#8221; with iOS4. I&#8217;ll be honest though, this isn&#8217;t that important to me. My biggest gripe with the iPhone is that it takes so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article from TUAW on what iOS4 multitasking really means. There are a lot of people who keep reminding the masses that there are only a few applications that will truly &#8220;multitask&#8221; with iOS4. I&#8217;ll be honest though, this isn&#8217;t that important to me. My biggest gripe with the iPhone is that it takes so long to get from one app to another and back. It appears that with developer support most apps will improve this immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/tuaw-ios4-multitasking-reality-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Gruber On New AT&amp;T Data Plans</title>
		<link>http://daringfireball.net/2010/06/good_and_bad_regarding_att_data_plans</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/john-gruber-on-new-att-data-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is about 10 days old but it&#8217;s just excellent. It covers a lot of thoughts I have had in the last couple weeks but have not had time to write about. I agree with what he called Good and Bad and think his points about streaming apps like Pandora are right on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is about 10 days old but it&#8217;s just excellent. It covers a lot of thoughts I have had in the last couple weeks but have not had time to write about. I agree with what he called Good and Bad and think his points about streaming apps like Pandora are right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/john-gruber-on-new-att-data-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&#8217;s Ridiculous Tethering Option</title>
		<link>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/atts-ridiculous-tethering-option/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/atts-ridiculous-tethering-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/atts-ridiculous-tethering-option/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Side Note: I have returned from my blogging abyss. I have been busy, we just moved, and haven&#8217;t had much time to blog. But I am getting back to it. AT&#038;T announced last week that they are changing their data plans. A key part of this is that they finally enable tethering for US iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">Side Note: I have returned from my blogging abyss. I have been busy, we just moved, and haven&#8217;t had much time to blog. But I am getting back to it.</p>
<p style="clear: both">AT&#038;T <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/02/atandt-axes-unlimited-data-unveils-tethering-price/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tuaw.com/2010/06/02/atandt-axes-unlimited-data-unveils-tethering-price/?referer=');">announced last week</a> that they are changing their data plans. A key part of this is that they finally enable tethering for US iPhone users, for $20 a month.</p>
<p style="clear: both">I was as excited as anyone about tethering when it was announced last year at WWDC. I was definitely one of those people who seemed to recall AT&#038;T saying it would be coming by the end of last year, but apparently they claim to have never said that. My in-laws don&#8217;t have broadband, so when I am there my only internet access is my iPhone. I have thought about getting a MiFi or something similar countless times but decided it ultimately wasn&#8217;t worth the investment. I always assumed tethering would be pricey (somewhere in the $30-$60 range) but always assumed that it would include more data and hopefully be something you could turn on and off at will. </p>
<p style="clear: both">The sad part is that in order to get tethering you must switch to one of the new plans, most like the DataPro which does drop in price from $30 to $25, but also drops the data cap from 5 GB to 2 GB. In order to add tethering an additional $20 fee must be incurred. This means it will cost $55 a month for 2 GB of share data. It is completely inexcusable that AT&#038;T would change users for a feature to be enabled on their account. The data cap stays at 2GB even with tethering, so you are literally paying $20 for them flip a switch.</p>
<p style="clear: both">I also don&#8217;t think 2 GB is enough for a shared tethering plan. 2 GB won&#8217;t go very far on a laptop and I use between 500 MB and 1 GB on my phone alone. If there is one blessing, it&#8217;s that each additional GB will only cost $10. So for example, if you have the current iPhone 5 GB plan and a Verizon MiFi, you are basically paying $90 for 5 GB of phone and 5 GB of laptop data. $90 on the new AT&#038;T plan gets you 6 GB of shared data for $85. If you assume that you can get by with 1 GB of data on your phone (and most people can) you get the same 5 GB on your laptop for $5 less. As much as I hate AT&#038;T for what they are doing, this isn&#8217;t a bad deal.</p>
<p style="clear: both">Part of me wants to boycott this just because it&#8217;s so ridiculous that they would charge you $20 more without giving you any extra data. Part of me wants to jailbreak just so that I can use my data without the $20 fee. But honestly, if they allow you to add it and remove it as needed I could see myself taking advantage of it the few times a year I need it. I realize that if people still pay for it AT&#038;T will have no reason to change it, but when you look at the big picture, it&#8217;s not a horrible deal.</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/atts-ridiculous-tethering-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLB Throws Ads iPad App</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/02/foul-ball-mlb-inserts-ads-into-at-bat-2010-for-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/mlb-throws-ads-ipad-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of my big beefs with iPhone/iPad applications. The company has complete control over the software, so unless you don&#8217;t upgrade (and sometimes even if you do) you are subject to whatever changes the developer wants to make. If they want to take away features, or in this case start including advertisements, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my big beefs with iPhone/iPad applications. The company has complete control over the software, so unless you don&#8217;t upgrade (and sometimes even if you do) you are subject to whatever changes the developer wants to make. If they want to take away features, or in this case start including advertisements, there is nothing you can do about it. I don&#8217;t agree with the decision to suddenly start including ads in an application that when you paid $15 for it, it didn&#8217;t have ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/mlb-throws-ads-ipad-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Talks About Data Plan Changes</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/02/candid-answers-from-atandt-on-the-new-iphone-data-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/att-talks-about-data-plan-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s good that TUAW went and ask some questions. I am still bitter about the whole thing, but it&#8217;s interesting to see that if are an existing customer you can keep your existing plan upon renewal for at least the foreseeable future. I also did some math on the tethering option. Right now to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that TUAW went and ask some questions. I am still bitter about the whole thing, but it&#8217;s interesting to see that if are an existing customer you can keep your existing plan upon renewal for at least the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>I also did some math on the tethering option. Right now to have an iPhone and a MiFi it would cost you $90/month in data fees for 5 GB on each. For $85 under AT&amp;T&#8217;s new system you can get 6 GB of share data. The fact that you can turn tethering on and off at will is nice. There is a good chance I will take advantage of this at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/att-talks-about-data-plan-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Skype Charges for iPhone 3G Calls til 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/31/skype-quietly-delays-charges-for-iphone-app-calling/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/no-skype-charges-for-iphone-3g-calls-til-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skype apparently quickly retracted their plans to charge for 3G Skype to Skype calls on the iPhone. I have yet to see anyone explain why they were going to do this in the first place. Skype to Skype calls are free on computers. I suppose they may feel like there will be a big spike [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype apparently quickly retracted their plans to charge for 3G Skype to Skype calls on the iPhone. I have yet to see anyone explain why they were going to do this in the first place. Skype to Skype calls are free on computers. I suppose they may feel like there will be a big spike in usage, but nothing else to me makes sense.</p>
<p>I suspect they will ponder this for the rest of the year and give an explanation before they actually start charging people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/no-skype-charges-for-iphone-3g-calls-til-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Changes Data Plan Pricing</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/02/atandt-axes-unlimited-data-unveils-tethering-price/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/att-changes-data-plan-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crazy price changes coming to new AT&#38;T data plans. The &#8220;unlimited&#8221; plan went from 5 GB to 2 GB and dropped from $25 to $30. The argument is that most people only use 2 GB and now they can make money off the people who use more because the only option for more bandwidth is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy price changes coming to new AT&amp;T data plans. The &#8220;unlimited&#8221; plan went from 5 GB to 2 GB and dropped from $25 to $30. The argument is that most people only use 2 GB and now they can make money off the people who use more because the only option for more bandwidth is $10/GB extra.</p>
<p>My take on this is that it officially kills any chance of a Verizon iPhone being announced next week unless AT&amp;T really has no idea that it&#8217;s coming. This would kill their iPhone sales for sure.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really agree with the concept of taking things away without a significant price reduction, but it seems like telco companies do this a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/att-changes-data-plan-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumored Apple TV Update</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/28/some-further-thoughts-on-the-rumored-next-apple-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/rumored-apple-tv-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another good perspective on the rumored update to the Apple TV. I agree that Apple is late to the party on this one and that if it&#8217;s strictly a way to get stuff from iTunes (and not Netflix) I don&#8217;t see what it offers me that the current Apple TV doesn&#8217;t. I can&#8217;t see Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good perspective on the rumored update to the Apple TV. I agree that Apple is late to the party on this one and that if it&#8217;s strictly a way to get stuff from iTunes (and not Netflix) I don&#8217;t see what it offers me that the current Apple TV doesn&#8217;t. I can&#8217;t see Apple supporting Netflix since it competes with their movie rental service, but they do allow it on the iPad so who knows.</p>
<p>If the rumor of apps makes it basically a TV connected iPad is true, it&#8217;s interesting. This could be step one in phasing out the Mac as we know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/rumored-apple-tv-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon iPhone Could Attract 40% of AT&amp;T</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/26/analyst-40-of-atandt-customers-may-head-to-verizon-if-theres-a/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/verizon-iphone-could-attract-40-of-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting survey about people who would jump ship to Verizon if they got the iPhone. But I too tend to agree that with the newly increased early termination fee (I think it&#8217;s like $375) no one will bail early. I still know plenty of people who are tired of AT&#38;T&#8217;s service that no matter much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting survey about people who would jump ship to Verizon if they got the iPhone. But I too tend to agree that with the newly increased early termination fee (I think it&#8217;s like $375) no one will bail early. I still know plenty of people who are tired of AT&amp;T&#8217;s service that no matter much they improve things between now and (theoretical) Verizon iPhone they would leave anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/06/verizon-iphone-could-attract-40-of-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-organize iPhone Apps From Scratch</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/21/starting-from-zero-on-the-iphone-home-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/re-organize-iphone-apps-from-scratch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 03:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TUAW has a nice post on starting with zero apps on your home screen, figuring out which apps you use most and then moving them over one at a time as you need them. I did something similar a few months ago. It makes it a lot easier to find things and I have deleted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TUAW has a nice post on starting with zero apps on your home screen, figuring out which apps you use most and then moving them over one at a time as you need them. I did something similar a few months ago. It makes it a lot easier to find things and I have deleted a lot of unneeded apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/re-organize-iphone-apps-from-scratch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes Store Now Shows Rotten Tomatoes Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/20/itunes-store-now-shows-rotten-tomatoes-tomatometer-reviews-for-m/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/itunes-store-now-shows-rotten-tomatoes-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 03:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always been lukewarm on Rotten Tomatoes. I generally agree with the reviews but I don&#8217;t spend a ton of time on it. Most of the time I will just check a movie out and decide for myself, but it&#8217;s a pretty sweet concept nonetheless.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been lukewarm on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rottentomatoes.com/?referer=');">Rotten Tomatoes</a>. I generally agree with the reviews but I don&#8217;t spend a ton of time on it. Most of the time I will just check a movie out and decide for myself, but it&#8217;s a pretty sweet concept nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/itunes-store-now-shows-rotten-tomatoes-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone OS 4 beta 3 Adds More to Dock</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/05/04/iphone-os-4-beta-3-adds-orientation-lock-ipod-controls-to-multi/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/iphone-os-4-beta-3-adds-more-to-dock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 02:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New info on the latest iPhone OS beta&#8230; To the right of the orientation lock is a set of three controls for play/pause and track skipping in the iPod app, as well as a dedicated icon for the app itself. It seems likely this will replace the current &#8220;notification window&#8221; method for accessing iPod controls [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New info on the latest iPhone OS beta&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>To the right of the orientation lock is a set of three controls for play/pause and track skipping in the iPod app, as well as a dedicated icon for the app itself. It seems likely this will replace the current &#8220;notification window&#8221; method for accessing iPod controls via a double-tap of the Home button.</p></blockquote>
<p>I figured they would have to do something in regards to iPod controls. Presently, you double-tap the home button to bring this up, but now double tapping will bring up the multitasking dock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/05/iphone-os-4-beta-3-adds-more-to-dock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T iPhone Tethering Still On Hold</title>
		<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/iphone-tethering-on-atandt-still-waiting-on-better-network-perform/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/att-iphone-tethering-still-on-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tethering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last June when Apple released iPhone 3.0 and officially announced tethering for the iPhone it left many people salivating with excitement. I personally couldn&#8217;t wait since my in-laws don&#8217;t have broadband and it would be nice to use when I am there. But shortly after the announcement we found out AT&#38;T wasn&#8217;t ready and we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last June when Apple released iPhone 3.0 and officially announced tethering for the iPhone it left many people salivating with excitement. I personally couldn&#8217;t wait since my in-laws don&#8217;t have broadband and it would be nice to use when I am there. But shortly after the announcement we found out AT&amp;T wasn&#8217;t ready and we were left waiting. Ten months later we are still waiting, with no end in sight.</p>
<p>Three years into the iPhone&#8217;s life and AT&amp;T is <em>still</em> unable to promise good performance. I know it&#8217;s been said before, but I am sure Apple regrets the decision to pick AT&amp;T over say T-Mobile. This is completely unacceptable. No one knows the terms of Apple&#8217;s agreement with AT&amp;T. It it were ending this year I think we would have heard by now, so I suspect we have at least one more iPhone left before it ends. Meanwhile, people are <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinrose/status/13093867096" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitter.com/kevinrose/status/13093867096?referer=');">switching</a> left and right just to avoid AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/att-iphone-tethering-still-on-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Kills Courier &#8220;Tablet&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/microsoft-confirms-kills-courier-in-one-fell-swoop/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fengadget+%28Engadget%29&utm_content=Google+Reader</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/microsoft-kills-courier-tablet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that Microsoft killed their dual-paned Courier device. My personal feelings are that they were two years from launch and worried that Apple had too much of a head start.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that Microsoft killed their dual-paned Courier device. My personal feelings are that they were two years from launch and worried that Apple had too much of a head start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/microsoft-kills-courier-tablet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Apple Design Awards for Desktop Software</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/28/apple-disses-the-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/no-apple-design-awards-for-desktop-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big news of the day is that Apple finally announced WWDC information. But the nerdier fans have been alerted by developers that when Apple listed their categories for Apple Design Awards it appears that only applications in the App Store will qualify, which means iPhone/iPad apps only and no desktop apps. A lot of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big news of the day is that Apple finally <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/28/wwdc-2010-officially-announced/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tuaw.com/2010/04/28/wwdc-2010-officially-announced/?referer=');">announced WWDC information</a>. But the nerdier fans have been alerted by developers that when Apple listed their categories for Apple Design Awards it appears that only applications in the App Store will qualify, which means iPhone/iPad apps only and no desktop apps.</p>
<p>A lot of people are reading into this that either, A) Apple is going to announce on WWDC that the Mac is changing to a more iPhone-like OS or B) OS X is staying the same but desktop application distribution will only be available through the App store.</p>
<p>Based on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X#Versions" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X_Versions?referer=');">previous history</a> we would expect 10.7 to be announced in June for release sometime next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/no-apple-design-awards-for-desktop-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secure Passwords in Your Wallet</title>
		<link>http://passwordcard.org/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/secure-passwords-in-your-wallet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting website called PasswordCard that let&#8217;s you use very strong passwords just by remembering a combination of a symbol and color. I still prefer 1Password, but this is a great low-tech solution. I wish I could get people I know to use more secure passwords. (via Lifehacker)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting website called PasswordCard that let&#8217;s you use very strong passwords just by remembering a combination of a symbol and color. I still prefer 1Password, but this is a great low-tech solution. I wish I could get people I know to use more secure passwords.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5521990/passwordcard-hides-mentally-encrypted-passwords-in-your-wallet?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lifehacker%2Ffull+%28Lifehacker%29" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/lifehacker.com/5521990/passwordcard-hides-mentally-encrypted-passwords-in-your-wallet?utm_source=feedburner_amp_utm_medium=feed_amp_utm_campaign=Feed_3A+lifehacker_2Ffull+_28Lifehacker_29&amp;referer=');">Lifehacker</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/secure-passwords-in-your-wallet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>13&#8243; MacBook Pro Still With Core 2 Duos</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/20/why-the-13-macbook-pro-still-uses-core-2-duo-cpus/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/13-macbook-pro-still-with-core-2-duos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were a lot of questions about why Apple didn&#8217;t put the i5 in the 13 inch machine. My theory was that they wanted to separate the high-end 13 inch and the low-end 15 inch. Prior to the new machines, the high-end 13 inch and low-end 15 inch has the exact same specs except for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were a lot of questions about why Apple didn&#8217;t put the i5 in the 13 inch machine. My theory was that they wanted to separate the high-end 13 inch and the low-end 15 inch. Prior to the new machines, the high-end 13 inch and low-end 15 inch has the exact same specs except for screen size, but cost $200 more. I suspect that the the more expensive machine was getting cannibalized. But apparently, my theory was wrong:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the end, engineering constraints led Apple to stay with Core 2 Duo processors in the 13&#8243; MacBook Pro for now. Cramming an i5 CPU into the chassis would have been possible, but it would have required sacrificing either graphics performance or taking a huge hit to battery life. Instead, graphics performance for the 13&#8243; MacBook Pro has improved by as much as 1.8x the performance of the 2009 model, and the 10-hour battery life is on par with the iPad, which is pretty stellar performance for a traditional notebook computer.</p></blockquote>
<p>This makes sense to me. Chris Rawson goes on to say that it&#8217;s very likely the 13 inch with get the i5 with the next update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/13-macbook-pro-still-with-core-2-duos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Reasons to Still Like the iMac</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/19/five-reasons-why-i-still-like-the-imac/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/five-reasons-to-still-like-the-imac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Sande takes to defending himself as to why he prefers the iMac to other Mac machines. I waver pretty much constantly about which the best machine is. If the 27-inch iMac had been released before I upgraded my MacBook Pro in October, I likely would have bought that instead. Sande makes some good points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Sande takes to defending himself as to why he prefers the iMac to other Mac machines. I waver pretty much constantly about which the best machine is. If the 27-inch iMac had been released before I upgraded my MacBook Pro in October, I likely would have bought that instead. Sande makes some good points and it&#8217;s worth taking a peak at if you are ever on the fence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/five-reasons-to-still-like-the-imac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TUAW Says AppleCare Worth It</title>
		<link>http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/18/applecare-without-apple-still-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/tuaw-says-applecare-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I waiver back and forth constantly about whether AppleCare is worth it. I made use of it on my last two Apple laptops. I am sure the anti-Apple folk will say that &#8220;laptops that expensive shouldn&#8217;t break down,&#8221; but they do. Macs, like any other complex bit of electronics, aren&#8217;t free from problems. Sturdy as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I waiver back and forth constantly about whether AppleCare is worth it. I made use of it on my last two Apple laptops. I am sure the anti-Apple folk will say that &#8220;laptops that expensive shouldn&#8217;t break down,&#8221; but they do.</p>
<blockquote><p>Macs, like any other complex bit of electronics, aren&#8217;t free from problems. Sturdy as they are, they do tend to break, and when they do, the repair costs can be astronomical. If you luck out and get a perfect, worry-free machine, then AppleCare may not seem worth it. But if you wind up with a problem child Mac like the one my wife got, AppleCare may be the difference between having a working Mac, or falling back on an abacus.</p></blockquote>
<p>AppleCare extends your warranty from 1 year to 3 years and you have until your 1 year warranty ends to purchase it so you don&#8217;t have to decide right away. In the case of Chris Rawson&#8217;s wife, it&#8217;s apparent she got her moneys worth. I think it ultimately comes down to how long you plan to have the machine. I just upgraded my MacBook Pro in October even though my previous model was less than three years old. I think if you know you are going to replace your machine in about 3 years, save your money and put it towards your next computer in 3 years. If you are planning to have it for 5 or more, it&#8217;s definitely worth making sure you can make it through the first three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nick.pazoles.com/blog/2010/04/tuaw-says-applecare-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
